Sensible Portions vs Triscuits

How do Sensible Portions and Triscuits compare inside AI answers? Across the latest Famewise run, here is each brand's visibility in ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini — and how often they are named together.

Sensible Portions
29answers mention it
#21.7avg position
Positive (+0.55)sentiment
Triscuits
68answers mention it
#9.1avg position
Positive (+0.56)sentiment

Relative share of voice

Of the 97 mentions across the two brands, Sensible Portions takes 30% and Triscuits 70%. They are named together in 20 answers.

How this is measured

Famewise generates the category-level questions consumers ask AI assistants, then asks them to current OpenAI GPT, Anthropic Claude and Google Gemini models — each question with web search on and off. An extraction model records every brand named in every answer, the position of its first mention, and the sentiment toward it. Brands are ranked by share of voice: the number of answers that mention them. Every number reflects the latest scheduled run.

Frequently asked questions

Is Sensible Portions or Triscuits more visible in AI answers?

In the latest Famewise run, Sensible Portions is named in 29 AI answers and Triscuits in 68. Triscuits has the higher share of voice. The two are named together in 20 answers.

How are Sensible Portions and Triscuits measured?

Famewise asks current OpenAI GPT, Anthropic Claude and Google Gemini models the questions consumers ask in these brands' categories — with and without web search — and records every brand each answer names, its position, and the sentiment toward it.

Track your brand's share of voice in AI answers.

Sign up free