Back to Nature vs Wasa: AI Share of Voice Comparison
In the latest Famewise run (data as of 2026-11-09), Back to Nature was named in 11 AI answers and Wasa in 30, across ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini with web search on and off. Wasa holds the larger share of voice. They are named together in 6 answers.
| Back to Nature — answers naming it | 11 |
|---|---|
| Wasa — answers naming it | 30 |
| Share of voice split | Back to Nature 27% / Wasa 73% |
| Answers naming both | 6 |
| AI models | OpenAI GPT, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini |
Updated
Relative share of voice
Of the 41 mentions across the two brands, Back to Nature takes 27% and Wasa 73%. They are named together in 6 answers.
How this is measured
Famewise generates the category-level questions consumers ask AI assistants, then asks them to current OpenAI GPT, Anthropic Claude and Google Gemini models — each question with web search on and off. An extraction model records every brand named in every answer, the position of its first mention, and the sentiment toward it. Brands are ranked by visibility: the share of this category's answers that name them at least once. Share of mentions is a different cut of the same data — each brand's slice of every brand mention in the category. Every number reflects the latest scheduled run.
Read the full methodology — sample sizes, formulas and refresh frequency →
Frequently asked questions
Is Back to Nature or Wasa more visible in AI answers?
In the latest Famewise run, Back to Nature is named in 11 AI answers and Wasa in 30. Wasa has the higher share of voice. The two are named together in 6 answers.
How are Back to Nature and Wasa measured?
Famewise asks current OpenAI GPT, Anthropic Claude and Google Gemini models the questions consumers ask in these brands' categories — with and without web search — and records every brand each answer names, its position, and the sentiment toward it.
Is your brand visible in AI answers? Check it free — then track your share of voice run over run.
Check your brand free Sign up